Teams

Sports Mall-Adams/Heiden

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W PM

21 players · average NTRP 3.96 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Natalie Watts vs Kristi Warren / Sabrena Suite-Mangum1-6, 2-6
2025-04-15vs Sports Mall-DayLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lewis / Natalie Watts vs Kassie Torres / Alexandra Spruill4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Amber Jorgensen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Julie Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.81
Teisa Linscott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Susan Koelliker
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.73
Katy Alder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Mithona Nielsen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
3.69
Gretchen Soffe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Joanna Heiden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Annalyn Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Amelia Linscott
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.40
Natalie Watts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Amanda Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Lindie Hoggan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Michelle Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Nicole Reese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Kristy Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Tiffany Renfro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Kristel Affleck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Katie Zimmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kasteler + Annalyn Adams5069% games+17.9% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Kristel Affleck8461% games+7.8% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Michelle Edwards4649% games+6.9% vs expected
Amanda Lewis + Kristel Affleck7652% games+5.5% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker311058% games+4.9% vs expected
Nicole Reese + Michelle Edwards512956% games+4.7% vs expected
Natalie Watts + Amanda Lewis3450% games+4.6% vs expected
Susan Koelliker + Julie Cooley9067% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amber Jorgensen
114W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Julie Cooley
63W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Tiffany Kasteler
166W–104L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Teisa Linscott
170W–105L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Mithona Nielsen
113W–116L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Gretchen Soffe
79W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Annalyn Adams
122W–97L career · 10 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Amelia Linscott
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Natalie Watts
41W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.40
4
Amanda Lewis
49W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.40
Lindie Hoggan
58W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.39
Michelle Edwards
94W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Nicole Reese
103W–62L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Kristy Olsen
72W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–116L career · 12 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Katie Zimmerman
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.