← Teams

Ol.Stephens18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs Sh.Leaver18SLost 0–1
L#2 SinglesOlga Stephens vs Mary Jo Nugent5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-30vs Ca.Robayo18S3.5Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-27Won 1–0
W#3 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Beth Holden6-4, 6-2
2023-06-13vs Pa.Hankerson18SSplit 1–1
L#2 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Paulina Powierza3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesVanese Clough vs Michelle Mills6-1, 6-4
2023-06-03vs Sh.Littleton18SSplit 1–1
L#2 SinglesVanese Clough vs Leigh Barter1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesOlga Stephens vs Traci Crabtree6-1, 6-3
2023-05-23vs La.Cox18SSplit 1–1
W#2 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Jennifer Anderson7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Laura Cox2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Liz Chen
published —
3.46
Emalie Levine
published 3.5
3.46
Dianna Erwin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Olga Stephens
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Vanese Clough
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Lisa Fultz
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanese Clough + Dianna Erwin11–954% games+1.3% vs expected
Lisa Fultz + Vanese Clough4–648% gamesnot enough data
Olga Stephens + Dianna Erwin8–266% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Fultz + Olga Stephens8–166% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Fultz + Dianna Erwin6–263% gamesnot enough data
Olga Stephens + Vanese Clough0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Emalie Levine
36W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Dianna Erwin
224W–99L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Olga Stephens
231W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Vanese Clough
173W–150L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Lisa Fultz
179W–126L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.