Teams

Sh.Littleton18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-16vs Pa.Hankerson18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesHilary Tew vs Pamela Hankerson7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTraci Crabtree vs QUEEN HARGROVE6-0, 6-4
2023-07-11Lost 01
L#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Leslie Weaver2-6, 4-6
2023-06-27vs Ca.Robayo18S3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Lola Jefferies6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Gillian Kelleher7-6, 6-0
2023-06-13vs Me.Bennett18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesHilary Tew vs Celia Whited6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Cristina Ennis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs La.Cox18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesHilary Tew vs Whitney Leab4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-03vs Ol.Stephens18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesHilary Tew vs Laura Ross4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Vanese Clough6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTraci Crabtree vs Olga Stephens1-6, 3-6
2023-05-23vs Sh.Leaver18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesHilary Tew vs Sharyn Leaver7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Mary Jo Nugent7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Skylar Poole
published
3.86
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.65
Hilary Tew
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.63
Julie Dougherty
published
3.50
Shannon Littleton
published
3.48
Traci Crabtree
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Katie Masood
published
3.13
Holly Atkinson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty11857% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skylar Poole
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
3.5
Hilary Tew
65W–57L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.65
Julie Dougherty
46W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.63
Shannon Littleton
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Traci Crabtree
182W–103L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Katie Masood
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Holly Atkinson
252W–179L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.