Teams

WNCT Shalloe (ARC South)

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 40+ Mixed 3.5 - Thursday PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Shalloe / Caroline Greiner vs Tom McDonnell / TLynn Gilpin2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Krueger / Leigh Etheridge vs Josh Wright / Adriane Deeter0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Jimenez / Maki Goskowicz vs Hilawe Semunegus / Kelly Gillis2-6, 3-6
2026-07-19vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Shalloe / Maki Goskowicz vs Stanley Treece / Adriane Deeter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWinfield Brians / Caroline Greiner vs Tom McDonnell / Tina Kinard2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Krueger / Leigh Etheridge vs Victor Johnson / Cindy Hile4-6, 2-6
2026-07-17vs WNCN O'Brien (ARC South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Jimenez / Meridith Elliott Powell vs Dave Kroondyk / Gina Livingston3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTom Shalloe / Maki Goskowicz vs Greg Lowe / Lee Lowe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Krueger / Leigh Etheridge vs Bill Kinard / Danielle Andrews6-3, 6-3
2026-07-09vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Marzendorfer / Theodore Brill vs Kelly Gillis / Hilawe Semunegus2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Greiner / William Jimenez vs Tom McDonnell / Tina Kinard2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJavier Garcia / Alice Chen vs Bethany Smith-Martin / Robin Smith-Martin6-4, 6-4
2026-07-02vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMeridith Elliott Powell / Javier Garcia vs Hilawe Semunegus / Kelly Gillis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlice Chen / Tom Shalloe vs Cindy Hile / Victor Johnson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeath Cope / Janey Cope vs Brian Strandtman / TLynn Gilpin6-3, 6-2
2026-06-26vs WNCN O'Brien (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Chen / Javier Garcia vs Danielle Andrews / Chris Tuten6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWilliam Krueger / Carolyn Marzendorfer vs Christiana Kroondyk / Dave Kroondyk1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTheodore Brill / Maki Goskowicz vs Breen OBrien / Nicole O'Brien7-5, 7-5
2026-06-18vs WNCN O'Brien (ARC South)Won 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Krueger / Caroline Greiner vs Greg Lowe / Lee Lowe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTom Shalloe / Maki Goskowicz vs Peter Cook / Danielle Andrews6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTheodore Brill / Carolyn Marzendorfer vs Breen OBrien / Nicole O'Brien7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs WNCN O'Brien (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLeigh Etheridge / William Jimenez vs Lee Lowe / Greg Lowe1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJaney Cope / Heath Cope vs Christiana Kroondyk / Dave Kroondyk5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJavier Garcia / Alice Chen vs Peter Cook / Danielle Andrews6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Mixed 3.5 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janey Cope
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
William Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
William Jimenez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Maki Goskowicz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Alice Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Winfield Brians
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Meridith Elliott Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Leigh Etheridge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Carolyn Marzendorfer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Heath Cope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Tom Shalloe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Theodore Brill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Caroline Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Shalloe + Maki Goskowicz4253% games+1.6% vs expected
Janey Cope + Heath Cope6258% games−5.4% vs expected
William Krueger + Leigh Etheridge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janey Cope
60W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.84
William Krueger
28W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
William Jimenez
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Maki Goskowicz
72W–34L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Alice Chen
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Winfield Brians
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Meridith Elliott Powell
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Leigh Etheridge
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Carolyn Marzendorfer
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Heath Cope
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Tom Shalloe
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Theodore Brill
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Caroline Greiner
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.