Teams

WNCN O'Brien (ARC South)

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 40+ Mixed 3.5 - Thursday PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-06vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBreen OBrien / Nicole O'Brien vs Stanley Treece / Tina Kinard1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Cook / Christiana Kroondyk vs Robin Smith-Martin / Bethany Smith-Martin7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-30vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDave Kroondyk / Christiana Kroondyk vs Josh Wright / Quenton Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Kinard / Tray Shapiro vs Tom McDonnell / Tricia Lancor0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Lowe / Lee Lowe vs Victor Johnson / TLynn Gilpin6-3, 6-3
2026-07-17vs WNCT Shalloe (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDave Kroondyk / Gina Livingston vs William Jimenez / Meridith Elliott Powell6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Lowe / Lee Lowe vs Tom Shalloe / Maki Goskowicz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBill Kinard / Danielle Andrews vs William Krueger / Leigh Etheridge3-6, 3-6
2026-06-26vs WNCT Shalloe (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Andrews / Chris Tuten vs Alice Chen / Javier Garcia1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristiana Kroondyk / Dave Kroondyk vs William Krueger / Carolyn Marzendorfer6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBreen OBrien / Nicole O'Brien vs Theodore Brill / Maki Goskowicz5-7, 5-7
2026-06-18vs WNCT Shalloe (ARC South)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesGreg Lowe / Lee Lowe vs William Krueger / Caroline Greiner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Cook / Danielle Andrews vs Tom Shalloe / Maki Goskowicz3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBreen OBrien / Nicole O'Brien vs Theodore Brill / Carolyn Marzendorfer6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-16vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Split 11
W#2 DoublesBreen OBrien / Nicole O'Brien vs Robin Smith-Martin / Bethany Smith-Martin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Cook / Tray Shapiro vs Brian Strandtman / Quenton Wright1-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Lowe / Lee Lowe vs Hilawe Semunegus / Kelly Gillis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Tuten / Gina Livingston vs Tom McDonnell / Tina Kinard1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBill Kinard / Tray Shapiro vs Brian Strandtman / Tricia Lancor0-6, 2-6
2026-06-04vs WNCT Shalloe (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLee Lowe / Greg Lowe vs Leigh Etheridge / William Jimenez6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristiana Kroondyk / Dave Kroondyk vs Janey Cope / Heath Cope7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeter Cook / Danielle Andrews vs Javier Garcia / Alice Chen2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Mixed 3.5 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Dave Kroondyk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Breen OBrien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Greg Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Danielle Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Gina Livingston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.07
Lee Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Tray Shapiro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Christiana Kroondyk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Nicole O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Chris Tuten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Bill Kinard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Peter Cook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Lowe + Lee Lowe3355% games+19.3% vs expected
Dave Kroondyk + Christiana Kroondyk7065% games+16.7% vs expected
Nicole O'Brien + Breen OBrien2642% games+3.3% vs expected
Danielle Andrews + Bill Kinard044 matchesnot enough data
Bill Kinard + Nicole O'Brien134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Kroondyk
101W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.75
3.5
Breen OBrien
22W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Greg Lowe
3W–3L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Andrews
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Gina Livingston
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.18
Lee Lowe
15W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Tray Shapiro
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Christiana Kroondyk
34W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Nicole O'Brien
31W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Chris Tuten
2W–4L career · type T · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Bill Kinard
12W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Peter Cook
13W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.