Teams

LTFC NAVY

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs LEBTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynn Price / Heidi David vs Tanya Cote / Emily Dreyer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVickie Conroy / Lisa Zook vs Alice Kustusch / Irene Serrano Delgado5-7, 4-6
2022-04-11vs HRCA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBriana Epp / Lynn Price vs Jane Jussila / Helen Lazzell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeidi David vs Ruby Fast1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Zook / Jennifer Henkel vs Michelle Millet / Danielle Butler5-7, 4-6
2022-04-11vs WC ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesVickie Conroy / Jennifer Henkel vs Melody Sattizahn / Laura Else6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLynn Price / Briana Epp vs Kyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-27vs PH GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesVickie Conroy / Jennifer Henkel vs Barbara Meyers / Kristin McDonald6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHeidi David vs Lina Politano3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Price / Lisa Zook vs Katie Mohler / Jessica Harms6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Price / Lisa Zook vs Melissa Miller / MISSY GOLDBERG3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHeidi David vs Tammy Gould2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Lynn Price
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Heidi David
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Vickie Conroy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Briana Epp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Jennifer Henkel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Lisa Zook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Zook + Heidi David2550% games+6.2% vs expected
Heidi David + Lynn Price3649% games+1.1% vs expected
Briana Epp + Lynn Price5651% games+0.7% vs expected
Vickie Conroy + Jennifer Henkel201156% games−0.2% vs expected
Lisa Zook + Lynn Price301952% games−0.8% vs expected
Lisa Zook + Vickie Conroy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Price
61W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Heidi David
42W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Vickie Conroy
83W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Briana Epp
81W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jennifer Henkel
94W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
Lisa Zook
57W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.