Teams

LEBTC RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs LTFC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesTanya Cote / Emily Dreyer vs Lynn Price / Heidi David3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJane Braaten vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlice Kustusch / Irene Serrano Delgado vs Vickie Conroy / Lisa Zook7-5, 6-4
2022-04-09vs LEBTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Nice / Jane Braaten vs Christina Schwartz / Lisa Mullett7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVanessa Parsons vs Susana Wanken4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlice Kustusch / Irene Serrano Delgado vs Maria Banta / Melissa Miller6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-02vs PH GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Braaten / Tanya Cote vs Kristin McDonald / Mauri Rapuzzi6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVanessa Parsons vs Kristin Overton6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesIrene Serrano Delgado / Emily Dreyer vs Brenna Mielenz / Lina Politano3-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs HRCA REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlice Kustusch / Tanya Cote vs Jane Jussila / Michelle Millet2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Parsons vs Audra Calzaretta6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJane Braaten / Diana Nice vs Helen Lazzell / Amy Keller6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-19vs WC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Kustusch / Diana Nice vs Virginia Gamble / Mary Ann Martin6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesIrene Serrano Delgado vs Laura Else6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTanya Cote / Emily Dreyer vs Kyle Davis / Melody Sattizahn7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Tanya Cote
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.25
Vanessa Parsons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Irene Serrano Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Diana Nice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Jane Braaten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Emily Dreyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alice Kustusch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Nice + Jane Braaten121348% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanya Cote
94W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
3.5
Vanessa Parsons
58W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Irene Serrano Delgado
25W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diana Nice
66W–126L career · 3 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.93
3
Jane Braaten
103W–196L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Emily Dreyer
68W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Alice Kustusch
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.