Teams

SFV - Simply Smashing 3.5

2025 Adult 18 SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.57
Tori Katz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Neda Khavari
published
3.24
Christy Weissman
published 3.5
3.21
Azatuhi Chinaryan
published 3.5
3.14
Sandra Jou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Pamela Rosenberg
published
3.01
Mary Anna Noveck
published
2.99
Adah Fretwell
published 3.5
2.99
Linda Kroff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Kat Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Norma Jean
published
2.81
Ashley Bol
published 3
2.79
Cindy Shih
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
ANALILY PARK
published 3
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Jou + Neda Khavari5655% games+3.2% vs expected
Linda Kroff + Pamela Rosenberg3443% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Mikaelian
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
3.5
Tori Katz
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Neda Khavari
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Christy Weissman
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Azatuhi Chinaryan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Sandra Jou
184W–106L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Pamela Rosenberg
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Mary Anna Noveck
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Adah Fretwell
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Linda Kroff
48W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Kat Kim
50W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Norma Jean
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Ashley Bol
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Cindy Shih
69W–99L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
ANALILY PARK
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.