Teams

Single Shenanigans

2023 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday · Shenandoah 3.5 Weekday FALL Singles Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.64 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Susan Egan6-0, 6-0
2023-10-09vs McMullenWon 10
W#3 SinglesJosephine Hughes vs Laleh Packard6-1
2023-10-03vs Chestnut ForksLost 01
L#1 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Andrea Moore3-6, 2-6
2023-09-25vs MiddleburgLost 12
L#1 SinglesAlison Naden vs Michelle Abalos3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJosephine Hughes vs Anne Walker6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesNancy Sicairos vs Sheila Harrell6-2, 6-1
2023-09-11vs Chestnut ForksWon 10
W#1 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Stephanie Kennedy6-3, 6-1
2023-08-28vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#1 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Michelle Abalos1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-21vs McMullenWon 20
W#2 SinglesAlison Naden vs Laleh Packard6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNancy Sicairos vs Lynn Colavita6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 3.5 Weekday FALL Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Nancy Sicairos
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Cristina Mantell
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.44
Christeen Tolle
published 3.5
3.32
Alison Naden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Ashley Harper
published 3.5
3.13
Kimberly Murray
published
3.12
Maria Costea
published
3.08
Josephine Hughes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josephine Hughes + Kimberly Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Sicairos
367W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Cristina Mantell
104W–92L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Christeen Tolle
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Alison Naden
117W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ashley Harper
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Kimberly Murray
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Maria Costea
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Josephine Hughes
76W–105L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.