Teams

TOC.Kumar

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs TOC.ChaudhariLost 12
W#1 DoublesARUN SELVARAJ / Kapil Dukle vs Kevin Johnson / Mahesh Salian6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSushrut Bhowmik / Balaji Radhakrishnan vs Ryan Sheppard / Luo Xiao6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNaga Mahesh Desu / Karan Mehra vs Justin Fowler / Austin Gardner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-09-01vs TOC.Byrd2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKapil Dukle / Balaji Radhakrishnan vs Vinicio Haro / Zachary Hopp4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesArun Kumar / RANDEEP BASU vs Jonathan Carter / Louis Crow5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSushrut Bhowmik / Karan Mehra vs Rodney Martin / Srivatsan Ramesh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-22vs TOC.GregsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesBalaji Radhakrishnan / Bhushan Pendse vs Jason High / Mark Scherr2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaran Mehra / Sushrut Bhowmik vs Jim Riddick / Ryan Gilbert2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesArun Kumar / RANDEEP BASU vs Ryan Berliner / NIKHIL PASULA6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Balaji Radhakrishnan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Karan Mehra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Bala Ramadoss
published 4
3.50
Sushrut Bhowmik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Kapil Dukle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
RANDEEP BASU
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Bhushan Pendse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Naga Mahesh Desu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Balaji Radhakrishnan + Karan Mehra3546% games−8.8% vs expected
Bala Ramadoss + Karan Mehra1537% games−12.0% vs expected
Bala Ramadoss + Balaji Radhakrishnan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Balaji Radhakrishnan
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Karan Mehra
18W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Bala Ramadoss
57W–104L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Sushrut Bhowmik
56W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Kapil Dukle
24W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
RANDEEP BASU
63W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Bhushan Pendse
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Naga Mahesh Desu
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.