Teams

Moon/Memphis

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 3.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-12vs Jeu/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Manshack / Fabricia Darosa vs Eva Jeu / Richard Jeu6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteve Denegri / Krista Weber vs Ricky Ley Aik Tan / Sandra Horn6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Heimann / Jo Picha vs Bill Clark / Kimberly Hester6-0, 7-5
2025-07-01vs Jeu/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesDoug Wilson / Emily Stolnicki vs Sandra Horn / Ricky Ley Aik Tan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWilliam Winstead / Diana Roedel vs Angela Kim / Davis Jeu5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGlenn Neilson / Jo Picha vs Eva Jeu / Richard Jeu6-0, 6-1
2025-05-31vs Akers/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKrista Weber / John Manshack vs Bonnie Price / Alan Moore6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTarshian Moon / Doug Wilson vs Ellen Vannucci / Michael Wittke6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJo Picha / William Winstead vs Ping Zhou / Michael Mohler6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Fabricia Darosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Jo Picha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
John Manshack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
William Winstead
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Emily Stolnicki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Krista Weber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Steve Denegri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Adam Bratton
published 3
2.87
Glenn Neilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Christopher Heimann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Diana Roedel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tarshian Moon + William Winstead4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fabricia Darosa
18W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.30
Jo Picha
33W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
John Manshack
40W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
William Winstead
32W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Emily Stolnicki
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Krista Weber
28W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Steve Denegri
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Adam Bratton
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Glenn Neilson
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Christopher Heimann
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Diana Roedel
18W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.