Teams

Fernandez (Salvadore Park)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.15 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Ana Tirado
published 3.5
3.13
Marilda del Rey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Paulina Escalante
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.00
Veronica Hernandez
published
2.92
Beth DeCamp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Inmaculada Clariana
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Yanik Labrador
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Andrea Knutson
published 3
2.71
Vickie Krall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Mina Schultes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Ana Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Maria Carpizo
published
2.45
CARYN MCDOUGAL
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Kathy Swank
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Fernandez + Inmaculada Clariana423753% games+11.3% vs expected
Vickie Krall + Yanik Labrador101253% games+7.5% vs expected
Ana Fernandez + Marilda del Rey4646% games+6.2% vs expected
Ana Fernandez + Andrea Knutson5749% games−1.1% vs expected
Vickie Krall + CARYN MCDOUGAL7454% games−3.1% vs expected
Mina Schultes + Vickie Krall162647% games−8.7% vs expected
Vickie Krall + Beth DeCamp7754% games−10.6% vs expected
Mina Schultes + Yanik Labrador191251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ana Tirado
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Marilda del Rey
153W–98L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Paulina Escalante
153W–174L career · type A · 11 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
Veronica Hernandez
8W–29L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Beth DeCamp
125W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Inmaculada Clariana
87W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Yanik Labrador
159W–173L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Andrea Knutson
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Vickie Krall
107W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Mina Schultes
101W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Ana Fernandez
84W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Maria Carpizo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
CARYN MCDOUGAL
49W–51L career · 1 line in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45
Kathy Swank
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.