Teams

Lakeland City in The Buff

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Friday Winter

9 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Friday Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cassie Miller
published 4
3.94
Elisa Buffington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Gretchen Wood
published 4
3.49
Shelley Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
Tessie Beltran
usually #2 Doubles 26%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
3.19
Anna Previte
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.15
Melanie Langley
published
3.03
Melissa Darch
published 3.5
2.64
Alyce Badcock
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Darch + Anna Previte211750% games+9.1% vs expected
Elisa Buffington + Cassie Miller7069% games+6.8% vs expected
Tessie Beltran + Anna Previte8357% games+6.6% vs expected
Elisa Buffington + Shelley Robinson4253% gamesnot enough data
Tessie Beltran + Melissa Darch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Miller
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Elisa Buffington
291W–167L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Gretchen Wood
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Shelley Robinson
50W–107L career · 15 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
Tessie Beltran
67W–80L career · 17 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Anna Previte
99W–73L career · 24 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Melanie Langley
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Melissa Darch
63W–77L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Alyce Badcock
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.