← Search

Shelley Robinson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakeland, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 67W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-11-03 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #4 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kerrie Hall
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-27 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kerrie Hall
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toni Kitchens
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-20 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kerrie Hall
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-16 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Wood
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-13 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Judy MacDougall
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-09 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Layug
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-06 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Janet Layug
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-02 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Wood
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Janet Layug
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Choe
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-22 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kerrie Hall
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
39%
16W–25L · 47% of games
3.5
63%
17W–10L · 53.9% of games
4.0
22.6%
24W–82L · 42.7% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 58% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#3 Female Doubles
5%
10 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova