← Search

Jackie Edwards

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lake Wales, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 107W–130L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history237 matches
W
2026-10-23 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Heather Cain
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-21 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Ute Vela-Marquez
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-20 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Meagan McGill
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-13 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Jantomaso
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-06 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Borders
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-29 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #4 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Borders
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-22 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Borders
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Arabia Brakefield
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan McGill
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-08 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Sharon Lockwood
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-02 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Leslie Simmons
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Cathy Robichaux
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
63.2%
36W–21L · 52.1% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
49.2%
32W–33L · 51.6% of games
4.0
20.4%
10W–39L · 37.1% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.2% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
21 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
13 matches
#3 Female Doubles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams