← Search

Cathy Robichaux

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Davenport, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 32W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history69 matches
L
2026-09-15 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Borders
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jackie Edwards
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Brand
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-05 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Brand
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan McGill
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-04 · Winter Haven City - J. Edwards · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Nadine Pantano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-23 · Winter Haven City - J. Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Knapp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-02 · Winter Haven City - J. Edwards · #5 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Leslie Simmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-04-11 · Le Grange/18/4.0/WN/LSU-O · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie LeGrange
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-03-20 · Lovell/40/4.0/WN/UC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mindy Lovell
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-03-12 · Lovell/40/4.0/WN/UC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Noonan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-03-07 · Le Grange/18/4.0/WN/LSU-O · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie LeGrange
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 57.2% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.6% of games
8.0mixed
20%
4W–16L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer