← Search

Kim Knapp

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Auburndale, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 54W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history123 matches
L
2026-11-03 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Lindsay Mahler
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-15 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Jantomaso
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · City of Winter Haven/Edwards · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Borders
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · Winter Haven Tri-Fecta Force/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Choe
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · Winter Haven Tri-Fecta Force/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Paine
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-02 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan McGill
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · Sanlando-Price · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niki Laguardia
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arabia Brakefield
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-19 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Mahler
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Sanlando-Price · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holli Turner
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · Sanlando-Price · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niki Laguardia
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-05 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Stevenson
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 46.4% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
43.3%
26W–34L · 45.8% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.3% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
10 matches
#2 Female Doubles
8%
10 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer