Teams

Winter - Wonder Women - Woodlands Parks

2023 Adult Tri-Level Women · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Amanda Nunes
published 4
3.79
Annie Lindholmer
published 4
3.46
Erika Breen
published 3.5
3.31
Rachel Polsky
published
3.30
Jennifer Guillory
published
3.29
Vanessa Krantzcke
published
3.28
Paola Tucker
published
3.20
Misty Winter
published
3.13
Amy Atnipp
published 3
3.02
Lynette Gillespie
published
2.84
Laura Joseph
published
2.68
Myriam Velasco
published
Karin Schneider
published
Laura Niemiec
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Polsky + Erika Breen1442% gamesnot enough data
Misty Winter + Rachel Polsky404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Guillory + Vanessa Krantzcke224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Nunes
31W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Annie Lindholmer
53W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Erika Breen
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Rachel Polsky
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
Jennifer Guillory
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Vanessa Krantzcke
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Paola Tucker
41W–44L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Misty Winter
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Amy Atnipp
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Lynette Gillespie
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Laura Joseph
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Myriam Velasco
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Karin Schneider
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Niemiec
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.