Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.0A-DT

2021 ADULT 40 & Over · Women's 4.0 Daytime

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-12vs OAKHURST CC 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Conversano / Tina Talbot vs Jeri Feuer / Eileen Ko6-7, 5-7
2021-08-03vs OAKHURST CC 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Conversano / Tanya Lo vs Jeri Feuer / Ana Larner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-08-02vs CROW CANYON CC 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Conversano / Ellie Kann vs Tracy Leeds / Nancy Doan7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEllie Kann / Mary Conversano vs Sarah Carey / Debbie Soleta6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Julianne Gee
published
3.82
Devon Brodhead
published 4
3.74
Debbie Soleta
published 4
3.64
Julie Yi
published
3.64
Mary Anjedani
published
3.56
Kristen Schaffel
published
3.51
Tanya Lo
published
3.48
Akiko Mitchell
published 3.5
3.37
Gail Pearson
published 4
3.33
Margaret Worden
published
3.30
Mary Conversano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Claudia Polidori
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Schaffel + Tanya Lo1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julianne Gee
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.96
4
Devon Brodhead
19W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Debbie Soleta
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Julie Yi
11W–12L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Mary Anjedani
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
Kristen Schaffel
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
Tanya Lo
9W–22L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Akiko Mitchell
19W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.48
4
Gail Pearson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
3.37
Margaret Worden
15W–23L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Mary Conversano
67W–89L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Claudia Polidori
7W–14L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.