Teams

ARAGON HS 18AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesMasami Matsuura / Elizabeth Cheung vs Yuko Miyagawa / Eunice Kan6-3, 7-6
2025-05-18vs COLONY CLUB 18AW4.0ASplit 11
W#1 SinglesJulia Fung vs Francesca Vera6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Jiang / Betty Lee vs Sarah Simnett / Jillian Gee1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Lao vs Jennifer Berman6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClaire Gea / Tien-Hsin Lin vs Eunice Kan / Anh-Vi Dao6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Adeeti Ullal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Yukari Saito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Julia Fung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Claire Gea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.98
Helen Lam
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Amy Jiang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.85
Michelle Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.85
Privina Sexton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Kristen Wong
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.79
Tien-Hsin Lin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Joany Gao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Katelyn Lao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Karissa Watanabe
published
3.69
Yiwen Xie
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Iris Xin
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.61
Elizabeth Cheung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Masami Matsuura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Betty Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Jiyun Hong
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Esther Chen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Jiang + Yukari Saito5085% games+13.3% vs expected
Joany Gao + Jiyun Hong4356% games+8.8% vs expected
Tien-Hsin Lin + Joany Gao033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adeeti Ullal
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
4.41
Yukari Saito
41W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.33
Julia Fung
30W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
3.5
Claire Gea
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.00
Helen Lam
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Amy Jiang
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Michelle Nicholson
45W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Privina Sexton
40W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.85
Kristen Wong
19W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Tien-Hsin Lin
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Joany Gao
21W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
Katelyn Lao
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Karissa Watanabe
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Yiwen Xie
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Iris Xin
99W–36L career · 18 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Elizabeth Cheung
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Masami Matsuura
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Betty Lee
18W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jiyun Hong
18W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Esther Chen
15W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.