Teams

Forever Smashed

2025 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-09vs Doubles or Nothin’Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Nelson / Betty Reed vs Eva VanCuren / Linda Butler5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-02vs Swing SistersWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Nelson / Betty Reed vs Teresa Giamportone / Sue White6-1, 6-2
2025-08-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Nelson / Betty Reed vs Mary Adcox / Mary Chodroff3-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs Doubles or Nothin’Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRosa Carnot / Nancy Nelson vs Trudy Fouser / Vicki Flume7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Nelson / Betty Reed vs Cassie Swanson / Janna Tipton6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Forever Smashed62131127223
2Doubles or Nothin’44141029238
3Swing Sisters2691533233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Margot Gilna
published 4
3.37
Suzanne Thomas
published 3
3.33
Mary Stone-Arave
published 3.5
3.29
Shannon Page
published 3.5
3.28
Suzanne Malmstrom
published 3.5
Betty Reed
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Margaret Burke
published 3.5
3.08
Roxy Therrien
published 3.5
2.82
Rosa Carnot
published 3
2.78
Kathne Morrell
published 3
Nancy Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Burke + Rosa Carnot6262% games+0.8% vs expected
Kathne Morrell + Margot Gilna14455% games+0.6% vs expected
Suzanne Malmstrom + Margaret Burke9852% games−2.5% vs expected
Rosa Carnot + Kathne Morrell1839% games−9.5% vs expected
Margaret Burke + Nancy Nelson12851% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Page + Roxy Therrien4844% gamesnot enough data
Mary Stone-Arave + Rosa Carnot4747% gamesnot enough data
Roxy Therrien + Margaret Burke2739% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margot Gilna
84W–66L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
3
Suzanne Thomas
75W–44L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Mary Stone-Arave
26W–41L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Shannon Page
23W–33L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Suzanne Malmstrom
108W–111L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Betty Reed
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Margaret Burke
50W–71L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Roxy Therrien
63W–80L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Rosa Carnot
40W–79L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Kathne Morrell
47W–83L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Nancy Nelson
20W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.