Teams

SSC Akierman

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 M Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-26vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#3 DoublesNate Macksey / Ron Forzani vs Dave Barcomb / DONALD LAGASSE6-3, 6-3
2025-03-22vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJaime Villegas / Jon Miller vs Wayne Osher / Steve Bautista6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Laurel Oak RosenbergLost 01
L#3 DoublesNate Macksey / Ron Forzani vs David Rosenberg / Lance Schilling2-6, 6-7
2025-03-01vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Fiumefreddo / Jaime Villegas vs Antonio Nicolini / Jonathan Cranos4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-27vs Laurel Oak RosenbergLost 01
L#3 DoublesNate Macksey / Ron Forzani vs David Rosenberg / Dave Barcomb6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Sarasota/Casanova/40&Over4.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesRon Forzani / Nate Macksey vs David Dwyer / Steven Paley6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Nate Macksey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Barney Akierman
published 4
3.80
Jim Fiumefreddo
published
3.72
Peter Laughlin
published
3.72
Kip Schoonover
published
3.71
Felipe Soto
published 4
3.71
Jaime Villegas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Eric Abbott
published 4
3.66
Ron Forzani
published
3.60
RON NOURSE
published
3.45
Dustin Keith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Larry Anglada
published
William Rhodes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Felipe Soto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nate Macksey
70W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Barney Akierman
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Jim Fiumefreddo
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Peter Laughlin
76W–44L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Kip Schoonover
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Felipe Soto
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Jaime Villegas
129W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Eric Abbott
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Ron Forzani
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
RON NOURSE
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Dustin Keith
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Larry Anglada
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Rhodes
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.