Teams

Boulevard Rally Cats/Blando

2026 IRMSL Adult 55 & Over WINTER · 8.0 Women Sat

18 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-28vs IRMSL/CummingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMARGARETTA ANDREWS / Terri Blando vs Sandy Palma / Marilena Lynch2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Kushner / Rachael McLaurin vs Dina Cummings / Morgann Loyd1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Hofmeister / Catherine Spahr vs Pamela Houri / Lori Glaspey2-6, 0-6
2026-03-21vs NRS/GimplLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Spahr / Nancy Nitardy vs Susan Gore / Carolyn Strong5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Blando / Jackie Blyth vs Grace Pillari / Darla Cederberg5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMARGARETTA ANDREWS / Carol Kelly vs Lisa Thiesen / Renee' Palmer6-2, 6-2
2026-03-11vs NRS/GimplWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatty Raby / Julie Hofmeister vs Brenda Gimpl / Lisa Wigley2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeslie London / Wendy Orthober vs Lisa Thiesen / Renee' Palmer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnita Venner / Michele Packard vs Carolyn Strong / Karen Higgins6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-07vs IRMSL/CummingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherri Glaab / Leslie London vs Dina Cummings / Sandy Palma3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Blando / Michele Packard vs Gillian Boice / Marguerite Madden0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRachael McLaurin / Anita Venner vs Lori Glaspey / Pamela Houri6-7, 2-6
2026-02-21vs IRMSL/CummingsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLorraine Paxson / Carol Kelly vs Marguerite Madden / Marie-Paule Cafmeyer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Nitardy / Sherri Glaab vs Lori Glaspey / Beth Daly7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesWendy Orthober / Mary Bowman vs Dina Cummings / Pamela Houri4-6, 2-6
2026-02-14vs IRMSL/CummingsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Venner / Jackie Blyth vs Dina Cummings / Sandy Palma1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLorraine Paxson / Sharon Milliman vs Lori Glaspey / Karen Neri5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRachael McLaurin / Mary Bowman vs Marguerite Madden / Gillian Boice6-3, 6-4
2026-01-24vs NRS/GimplLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Nitardy / Catherine Spahr vs Susan Gore / Carolyn Strong6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Blyth / Wendy Orthober vs Anna Haman / Rebecca Fulper4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTerri Blando / Patty Raby vs Lisa Thiesen / Karen Higgins3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-10vs NRS/GimplLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Kushner / Anita Venner vs Brenda Gimpl / Lisa Wigley3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Glaab / Leslie London vs Susan Gore / Carolyn Strong3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMARGARETTA ANDREWS / Carol Kelly vs Grace Pillari / Anna Haman6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Wendy Orthober
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Patty Raby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Nancy Nitardy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Jackie Blyth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Lorraine Paxson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Rachael McLaurin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Leslie London
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Anita Venner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Lauren Kushner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Catherine Spahr
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Julie Hofmeister
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
MARGARETTA ANDREWS
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Packard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon Milliman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri Glaab
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sue Davis
published
Terri Blando
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Orthober
72W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Patty Raby
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Nancy Nitardy
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Jackie Blyth
22W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Lorraine Paxson
65W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Rachael McLaurin
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Leslie London
47W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Anita Venner
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Lauren Kushner
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Catherine Spahr
7W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Julie Hofmeister
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
MARGARETTA ANDREWS
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Bowman
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Packard
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Milliman
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sherri Glaab
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sue Davis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Blando
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.