Teams

Elysium

2025 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 MEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-19vs WickertreeWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Ewing / Matt Larsen vs Casey Cempre / Jeffrey Cempre4-6, 5-3
W#1 SinglesAndrew Codita vs Juan Vera6-2, 6-4
2025-03-31vs The Players ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Ewing / Kavya Desai vs Michael Herzog / Ben Hodgkiss-Lilly4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Codita vs Griffin Celleghin6-3, 6-4
2025-03-14vs Racquet ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMilan Pereira / Tetsuro Togawa vs Jordan Phelps / Matthew Wareti2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Codita vs Leander Dixon6-0, 6-3
2025-02-21vs WickertreeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMilan Pereira / Tetsuro Togawa vs Casey Cempre / SURIYA SUNDARAM7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAdam Ewing / Kavya Desai vs Daniel Bishoff / Juan Vera1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-07vs The Players ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Codita / Adam Ewing vs Patrick McColgan / Aaron Koch7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Larsen vs Vivek Ramaswamy5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMilan Pereira / Tetsuro Togawa vs Griffin Celleghin / Daniel Reed Detrick4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Andrew Codita
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.46
Kavya Desai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Tetsuro Togawa
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
4.33
Milan Pereira
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Adam Ewing
published 4.5
4.11
Matt Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tetsuro Togawa + Milan Pereira11555% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Codita
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.81
Kavya Desai
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
4.46
Tetsuro Togawa
53W–23L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
Milan Pereira
53W–35L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Adam Ewing
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Larsen
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.