Teams

Racquet Club

2025 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-30vs WickertreeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJordan Phelps / Gabe Higgs-Horwell vs Casey Cempre / Jeffrey Cempre6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNicholas Aronoff vs Blaine Carr4-6, 0-6
2025-03-14vs ElysiumSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJordan Phelps / Matthew Wareti vs Milan Pereira / Tetsuro Togawa6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLeander Dixon vs Andrew Codita0-6, 3-6
2025-02-21vs The Players ClubSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLeander Dixon vs Eric Chabot7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Wareti / Nicholas Aronoff vs J R Pepino / Aaron Koch6-2, 6-1
2025-02-07vs WickertreeWon 30
W#1 DoublesGabe Higgs-Horwell / Jordan Phelps vs Grant MacPherson / Bradley Strawser6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Wareti vs Andy MacKler7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLeander Dixon / Nicholas Aronoff vs Casey Cempre / Jeffrey Cempre5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
Gabe Higgs-Horwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.51
Nicholas Aronoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.41
Matthew Wareti
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.14
Federico Ochoa
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.14
Leander Dixon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
Jarrett Skrobarcek
published
Jordan Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Phelps + Matthew Wareti4165% games+9.2% vs expected
Nicholas Aronoff + Leander Dixon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabe Higgs-Horwell
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.75
Nicholas Aronoff
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
Matthew Wareti
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.41
Federico Ochoa
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Leander Dixon
35W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.14
Jarrett Skrobarcek
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Jordan Phelps
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.