Teams

Montana/Sheehan/4.0M

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Men 4.0 - 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-19vs Q teamWon 30
W#1 DoublesBen Hogins / Jon Catton vs Mark Oja / Casey Dudley6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicholas Scott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Joos / Chris Bauerle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-18vs Q teamWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicholas Scott / Chris Bauerle vs Brian Clifton / James Stevens4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Joos vs Cody Maynard7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKenneth Sheehan / Ben Hogins vs Cary Burg / Jim Schleh6-3, 6-2
2022-06-17vs Q teamWon 40
W#1 DoublesKenneth Sheehan / Jon Catton vs Jim Schleh / Cary Burg6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrian Joos vs Scott Alexander6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJoel Thompson vs Joe Salyer7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBlake Phillippi / Ben Hogins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Sheehan/4.0M30132882
2Q team0321327171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Nicholas Scott
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
Ben Hogins
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Brian Joos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Chris Bauerle
published
Joel Thompson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jon Catton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Sheehan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Nicholas Scott
42W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
4.59
4
Ben Hogins
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Brian Joos
21W–34L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Chris Bauerle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joel Thompson
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jon Catton
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Sheehan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.