Teams

Q team

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Men 4.0 - 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-19vs Montana/Sheehan/4.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Oja / Casey Dudley vs Ben Hogins / Jon Catton4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBruce Hazeltine vs Avery Sindelar6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCary Burg / Jim Schleh vs Blake Phillippi / Kenneth Sheehan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-18vs Montana/Sheehan/4.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Clifton / James Stevens vs Nicholas Scott / Chris Bauerle6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCody Maynard vs Brian Joos6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCary Burg / Jim Schleh vs Kenneth Sheehan / Ben Hogins3-6, 2-6
2022-06-17vs Montana/Sheehan/4.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Schleh / Cary Burg vs Kenneth Sheehan / Jon Catton4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Clifton / James Stevens vs Avery Sindelar / Chris Bauerle1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJoe Salyer vs Joel Thompson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Sheehan/4.0M30132882
2Q team0321327171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Josiah Petersen
published 4.5
4.04
James Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Cody Maynard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Cary Burg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
Bruce Hazeltine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Brian Clifton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jim Schleh
published
Joe Salyer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mark Oja
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cary Burg + Mark Oja033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Josiah Petersen
52W–29L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
James Stevens
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Cody Maynard
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cary Burg
5W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Bruce Hazeltine
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Brian Clifton
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Schleh
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Salyer
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mark Oja
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.