Teams

IE-Bear Creek/Vista HS-Ustariz

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-23vs IE-Half & Half-Eagles Glen-TranWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Daniel Anguiano vs Roman Chon / Alexis Lopez7-6, 6-4
2024-11-16vs IE-Elevenis-PereyraLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarlos Hansen / Tony Archer vs Michael Munoz / Richard Taylor6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVic Haggerty / Ryan Williams vs Phu Xuan Lam / Hung Pham4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Boyd / Daniel Anguiano vs Mehul Dhamsania / Jeff Bixler1-6, 1-6
2024-11-03vs IE-Half & Half-Eagles Glen-TranLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Anguiano / David Boyd vs Jie Mei / Alexis Lopez1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Hansen / Tony Archer vs Spencer Nguyen / Quang Tran6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVic Haggerty / Ryan Williams vs Timmy Tran / Theodore Nguyen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-26vs IE-Elevenis-PereyraWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Hansen / Mario Irizarry vs Mehul Dhamsania / Michael Munoz6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-19vs IE-LLW-McDermott-The Nobodies-YehLost 02
L#1 DoublesBill Conlin / Ethan Perkins vs TEVIN JENKINS / Anurag Anand1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / David Boyd vs Jayce Graham / Javier Rodriguez3-6, 3-6
2024-10-12vs IE-Half & Half-Eagles Glen-TranLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Vic Haggerty vs Quang Tran / Jie Mei3-6, 4-6
2024-10-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesEdwin Ustariz / Vic Haggerty vs Daniel Taylor / Lennie Brown6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Carlos Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Randy Sinnett
published
3.40
Edwin Ustariz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bill Conlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Anguiano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ethan Perkins
published
Mario Irizarry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tony Archer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Vic Haggerty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Hansen
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Randy Sinnett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Edwin Ustariz
106W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Bill Conlin
19W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Anguiano
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ethan Perkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mario Irizarry
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tony Archer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vic Haggerty
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.