Teams

IE-Elevenis-Pereyra

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-07vs IE-Half & Half-Eagles Glen-TranWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Bixler / Mehul Dhamsania vs Timmy Tran / Jie Mei6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Taylor / Phu Xuan Lam vs Spencer Nguyen / Truong Quach6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs IE-Bear Creek/Vista HS-UstarizWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Munoz / Richard Taylor vs Carlos Hansen / Tony Archer2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPhu Xuan Lam / Hung Pham vs Vic Haggerty / Ryan Williams6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMehul Dhamsania / Jeff Bixler vs David Boyd / Daniel Anguiano6-1, 6-1
2024-11-09vs IE-Half & Half-Eagles Glen-TranWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Bixler / Mehul Dhamsania vs Southideth Phimmasone / Quang Tran7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Munoz / Phu Xuan Lam vs Timmy Tran / Theodore Nguyen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNelson Quintana / Richard Taylor vs Charles Chaya / Truong Quach6-3, 6-1
2024-10-26vs IE-Bear Creek/Vista HS-UstarizLost 02
L#1 DoublesMehul Dhamsania / Michael Munoz vs Carlos Hansen / Mario Irizarry2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Taylor / Vishal Lavingia vs Ryan Williams / David Boyd5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-19vs IE-Half & Half-Eagles Glen-TranWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhu Xuan Lam / Hung Pham vs Roman Chon / Spencer Nguyen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMehul Dhamsania / Daniel Taylor vs Timmy Tran / Kevin Lu6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Nelson Quintana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Mehul Dhamsania
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.90
Michael Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Hung Pham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Matthew Boland
published
Jeff Bixler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Phu Xuan Lam
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Vishal Lavingia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mehul Dhamsania + Jeff Bixler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelson Quintana
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
Mehul Dhamsania
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.04
Michael Munoz
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Hung Pham
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Matthew Boland
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jeff Bixler
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Phu Xuan Lam
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vishal Lavingia
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.