Teams

KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson

2025 USTA COMBO LEAGUE 40 & OVER LEXINGTO · 6.5 ADULT WOMEN

17 players · average NTRP 3.40 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-18vs KY/LEX/VOTH/6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Susan Miller vs Shera Moulton / April Russell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Worthington Johnson / Leah Lykins vs Leigh Shapiro / Mary Diggins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanine Coy / Kristyn Gordon vs Betty Grey / Sandy Biven6-4, 7-5
2025-09-13vs KY/LEX/CovingtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Paige Bensing vs Amy Johns / Brandi Simon6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Worthington Johnson / Shannon Wang vs Angie Cobb / Shama Hinard6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Bain / Leah Lykins vs Elizabeth Hardwick / Toni Halley4-6, 5-4
2025-09-05vs KY/LEX/VOTH/6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesJanine Coy / Paige Bensing vs Shera Moulton / Callie Manor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristyn Gordon / Emily Diehl vs Sandy Biven / Yvonne Conner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTanya Johnson / Laura Neutzling vs Sarah Hancock / Kasey Wilson6-3, 6-4
2025-08-18vs KY/LEX/CovingtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanine Coy / Paige Bensing vs Monica Mestanza / Elizabeth Hardwick6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Diehl / Sarah Back vs Diana Simpson / Regina Covington7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Rogier / Kristyn Gordon vs Elizabeth Doss / Monica King6-4, 6-4
2025-08-08vs KY/LEX/VOTH/6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJanine Coy / Shannon Wang vs Ria Voth / Vien Carter6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnne West / Amy Worthington Johnson vs Betty Grey / April Russell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Miller / Tanya Johnson vs Julia Hutchens / Yvonne Conner1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-05vs KY/LEX/CovingtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Delahanty / Natalie Avant vs Brandi Simon / Elizabeth Doss7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Worthington Johnson / Anne West vs Monica Mestanza / Raquel Wilson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Bain / Leah Lykins vs Angie Cobb / Diana Simpson6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Emily Diehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Janine Coy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Emily Pernice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Sarah Delahanty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Paige Bensing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Amy Worthington Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Amy Rogier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Christina Bishop
published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Amy Bain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Sarah Back
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Anne West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Natalie Avant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Leah Lykins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Laura Neutzling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Shannon Wang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Kristyn Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Bensing + Janine Coy3256% games+2.6% vs expected
Tanya Johnson + Natalie Avant0636% games−13.0% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Janine Coy224 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Wang + Anne West314 matchesnot enough data
Paige Bensing + Emily Diehl303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Sarah Delahanty
30W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Paige Bensing
43W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
22W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Amy Rogier
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Christina Bishop
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tanya Johnson
6W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Bain
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Sarah Back
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Anne West
36W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Natalie Avant
4W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Leah Lykins
36W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Laura Neutzling
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Shannon Wang
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Kristyn Gordon
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.