Teams

CACM GOLD

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs WP BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Sundeen / Kip Kelley vs Laura Lapsys / Laurie Wagner2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Stephanie Babbitt vs Courtney Schimschock / Sarah Garcia6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDarcy Kinnersley / Stephanie Bolsei vs Michelle Telfer / Susan Anderson0-6, 2-6
2021-05-31vs SKY GREYLost 04
L#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Jennifer Fitzgerald / Beth Godzich6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Sundeen vs Amy Crockett6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKip Kelley / Kaley Rickert vs Jennifer Clanahan / Jennifer Pearson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDarcy Kinnersley / Camille Ford vs Paula Daukas / Lila Wright1-6, 6-7
2021-05-30vs CP REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMaya Pingle Trinen / Stephanie Babbitt vs April Leahy / Lena Ursten Hobbs6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKip Kelley / Peggy Solinsky vs Tammy Chamberlain / Julie Schindler0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCamille Ford vs Katai Itta3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Kaley Rickert vs Liz LeClair / Amy Twardowski1-6, 1-6
2021-05-24vs DTC PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Kimberly Montgomery / Laura Rogers1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Kip Kelley vs Kristin Bokelman / Natasha Gallaway1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKaley Rickert vs Sheila Tsai0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Solinsky / Susan Sundeen vs JoEllen Legg / Kayla Hodges0-6, 1-6
2021-05-05vs WP PINKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Valerie Kilzer / Erica Jacobson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaley Rickert / Stephanie Babbitt vs Brooke Webb / Angela Fulcher3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCamille Ford vs Mary Albyn6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Peggy Solinsky vs Denise Fruit / Julie Archibald1-6, 0-6
2021-05-03vs GTC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Stephanie Babbitt vs Maureen Clarke / Cindy Wright6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKip Kelley / Peggy Solinsky vs Laura High / Jada Dixon4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Bolsei vs Karen Ryan5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDarcy Kinnersley / Kaley Rickert vs Cyndie Miller / AMY SITZE3-6, 2-6
2021-04-26vs CM ORANGESplit 22
W#1 DoublesStephanie Babbitt / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Margot Kelly / Tracy Donovan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKip Kelley / Susan Sundeen vs Mary Fitzpatrick / Lydia Tzagoloff4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKaley Rickert vs Ali Boyd1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCamille Ford / Darcy Kinnersley vs Beth Hasse / Leslie Madsen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Camille Ford
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Kaley Rickert
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
2.69
Merrell Aspin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Susan Sundeen
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Darcy Kinnersley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kip Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Peggy Solinsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Babbitt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Stephanie Bolsei
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merrell Aspin + Stephanie Babbitt6161% games+3.3% vs expected
Stephanie Bolsei + Kaley Rickert3346% games+2.2% vs expected
Merrell Aspin + Maya Pingle Trinen31441% games−2.7% vs expected
Susan Sundeen + Stephanie Bolsei3836% games−5.3% vs expected
Darcy Kinnersley + Camille Ford134 matchesnot enough data
Maya Pingle Trinen + Stephanie Babbitt224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Sundeen + Darcy Kinnersley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Camille Ford
34W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Kaley Rickert
43W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
Tae Rice-Schlesinger
28W–46L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Merrell Aspin
78W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Maya Pingle Trinen
24W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Susan Sundeen
21W–72L career · 4 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.40
Darcy Kinnersley
3W–17L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kip Kelley
0W–7L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Solinsky
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Babbitt
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Bolsei
20W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.