Teams

WP BLACK

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs CACM GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Lapsys / Laurie Wagner vs Susan Sundeen / Kip Kelley6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCourtney Schimschock / Sarah Garcia vs Merrell Aspin / Stephanie Babbitt2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichelle Telfer / Susan Anderson vs Darcy Kinnersley / Stephanie Bolsei6-0, 6-2
2021-06-02vs GTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCourtney Schimschock / Sarah Garcia vs Karen Ryan / Maureen Clarke6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRenee Keller vs Jennifer Kaufman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Lapsys / Marissa Ogden vs Cyndie Miller / AMY SITZE2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Wagner / Terre Buckley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-26vs CM ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesCourtney Schimschock / Sarah Garcia vs Kerri Holman / Ali Boyd4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Wagner / Marissa Ogden vs Alison Thompson / Margot Kelly2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRenee Keller vs Yvette Frampton6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Anderson / Terre Buckley vs Lydia Tzagoloff / Mary Fitzpatrick0-6, 4-6
2021-05-24vs CP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Anderson / Michelle Telfer vs Tammy Chamberlain / Deborah Clark2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Keller vs Deborah Alper0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Lapsys / Marissa Ogden vs Katai Itta / April Leahy6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTerre Buckley / Courtney Schimschock vs Amy Twardowski / Lena Ursten Hobbs4-6, 0-6
2021-05-21vs WP PINKWon 31
L#1 DoublesLaura Lapsys / Marissa Ogden vs Stephanie Baur / Justine McKinzie7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRenee Keller vs Katie Portenga7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Anderson / Michelle Telfer vs Brooke Webb / Angela Fulcher4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerre Buckley / Laurie Wagner vs Julie Archibald / Erica Jacobson6-2, 6-2
2021-05-05vs DTC PURPLELost 14
L#1 DoublesLaura Lapsys / Laurie Wagner vs Laura Rogers / Kimberly Montgomery4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRenee Keller vs Sheila Tsai2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarissa Ogden / Katy Massanari vs Kristin Bokelman / Natasha Gallaway0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesChristyn Benzle vs Elisabeth Vezzani7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerre Buckley / Sarah Garcia vs Kayla Hodges / JoEllen Legg0-6, 0-6
2021-04-26vs SKY GREYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Garcia / Courtney Schimschock vs Sara Visser / Jennifer Pearson0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristyn Benzle vs Jocelyn Murphy7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Anderson / Michelle Telfer vs Lila Wright / Sophie Wright3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerre Buckley / Katy Massanari vs Paula Daukas / Amy Crockett3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Marissa Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.14
Renee Keller
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.90
Courtney Schimschock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Katy Massanari
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Laura Lapsys
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Christyn Benzle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.55
Laurie Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Michelle Telfer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Terre Buckley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Sarah Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Wagner + Laura Lapsys11855% games+1.2% vs expected
Terre Buckley + Laurie Wagner2435% games−7.9% vs expected
Terre Buckley + Michelle Telfer044 matchesnot enough data
Terre Buckley + Katy Massanari134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Wagner + Courtney Schimschock044 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Wagner + Katy Massanari123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Lapsys + Courtney Schimschock303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Lapsys + Marissa Ogden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Ogden
35W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Renee Keller
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Courtney Schimschock
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Katy Massanari
31W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Laura Lapsys
62W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Christyn Benzle
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
2.60
Laurie Wagner
34W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.55
Michelle Telfer
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Terre Buckley
22W–69L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Garcia
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.