Teams

ETC:BaselineBitties:Martin:Plaut

2026 WMA Tri-Level Spring (2026) · 3.0 Women 1

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-14vs ETC:SpinHeads26:RakasWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Steele / Joy Baskin vs Anne Wheeler / Margaret Rakas6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Martin / Meredith Ulrich vs Jean Peretti / Liz Bone5-7, 4-6
2026-06-29vs LTC:AlleyCats:PrzybylLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Steele / Meredith Ulrich vs Megan Scully / Katie Wartman1-6, 2-6
2026-06-16vs LTC:TerrincaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadeleine Martin / Emma Plaut vs Eileen Jordan / Amy Hunter7-6, 3-1
2026-06-07vs ETC:PracticeBirds:CrowalWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoy Baskin / Emma Plaut vs Cassandra Crowal / Melissa Besse6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:PracticeBirds:Crowal4141443
2LTC:AlleyCats:Przybyl3232437
3ETC:BaselineBitties:Martin:Plaut3232445
4LTC:Terrinca1414950
5ETC:SpinHeads26:Rakas05051058

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Madeleine Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Joy Baskin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Emma Plaut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Emily Steele
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Meredith Ulrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Baskin + Emily Steele134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madeleine Martin
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Joy Baskin
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Emma Plaut
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Emily Steele
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Meredith Ulrich
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.