Teams

ETC:SpinHeads26:Rakas

2026 WMA Tri-Level Spring (2026) · 3.0 Women 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-14vs ETC:BaselineBitties:Martin:PlautLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Wheeler / Margaret Rakas vs Emily Steele / Joy Baskin2-6, 4-6
2026-07-13vs LTC:TerrincaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Dygon / Margaret Rakas vs Eileen Jordan / Catherine Wickens4-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMargaret Rakas / Kristen Dygon vs Elaine Grocott / Stephanie O'Leary3-6, 4-5
2026-06-07vs LTC:AlleyCats:PrzybylLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Dygon / Anne Wheeler vs Dena Przybyl / Katie Wartman3-6, 5-6
2026-06-04vs ETC:PracticeBirds:CrowalLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Wheeler / Kristen Dygon vs Cassandra Crowal / Sara Kulla3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:PracticeBirds:Crowal4141443
2LTC:AlleyCats:Przybyl3232437
3ETC:BaselineBitties:Martin:Plaut3232445
4LTC:Terrinca1414950
5ETC:SpinHeads26:Rakas05051058

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Allison Cheney
published 3
2.84
Margaret Rakas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Kristen Dygon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Wheeler
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Cheney + Kristen Dygon4258% games+15.5% vs expected
Allison Cheney + Margaret Rakas11358% games+8.6% vs expected
Margaret Rakas + Kristen Dygon10655% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Cheney
52W–36L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Margaret Rakas
64W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Kristen Dygon
36W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Anne Wheeler
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.