Teams

Reynolds 2.5

2026 Adult 18&over-NE · Men 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-19vs Hunter colemanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMike Reynolds / Dylan Quinn vs Jeff Buse / Leland Chrisman6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMatt Conn vs Kazuki Sato0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Hunter colemanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Gann / Tyler Richardson vs Hunter Coleman / Kazuki Sato7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCole McCarty vs Jeff Buse3-6, 1-6
2026-04-02vs Hunter colemanLost 02
L#1 DoublesMike Reynolds / Dylan Quinn vs Hunter Coleman / Daniel Luter2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJacob Gaines vs Kazuki Sato0-6, 0-6
2026-03-15vs Hunter colemanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Reynolds / Dylan Quinn vs Jeff Buse / Robert Stukenborg3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCole McCarty vs Kazuki Sato0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Gann / Tyler Richardson vs Leland Chrisman / Daniel Luter0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Hunter colemanLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Gann / Tyler Richardson vs Hunter Coleman / Kazuki Sato6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJacob Gaines vs Daniel Luter2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Conn / Cole McCarty vs Jeff Buse / Leland Chrisman0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Tyler Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Mike Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.38
Michael Gann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Dylan Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.14
Matt Conn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Cole McCarty
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Jacob Gaines
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Richard Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Quinn + Mike Reynolds213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Gann + Tyler Richardson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Richardson
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.94
Mike Reynolds
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Michael Gann
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
Dylan Quinn
4W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Matt Conn
4W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Cole McCarty
1W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Jacob Gaines
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Richard Davis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.