Teams

Hunter coleman

2026 Adult 18&over-NE · Men 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-19vs Reynolds 2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeff Buse / Leland Chrisman vs Mike Reynolds / Dylan Quinn1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKazuki Sato vs Matt Conn6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Reynolds 2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesHunter Coleman / Kazuki Sato vs Michael Gann / Tyler Richardson6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJeff Buse vs Cole McCarty6-3, 6-1
2026-04-02vs Reynolds 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesHunter Coleman / Daniel Luter vs Mike Reynolds / Dylan Quinn6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKazuki Sato vs Jacob Gaines6-0, 6-0
2026-03-15vs Reynolds 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Buse / Robert Stukenborg vs Mike Reynolds / Dylan Quinn6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKazuki Sato vs Cole McCarty6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeland Chrisman / Daniel Luter vs Michael Gann / Tyler Richardson6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-05vs Reynolds 2.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesHunter Coleman / Kazuki Sato vs Michael Gann / Tyler Richardson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Luter vs Jacob Gaines6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeff Buse / Leland Chrisman vs Matt Conn / Cole McCarty6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Kazuki Sato
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.52
Daniel Luter
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Robert Stukenborg
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.34
Hunter Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Jeff Buse
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.13
Leland Chrisman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kazuki Sato
13W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.58
2.5
Daniel Luter
4W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Robert Stukenborg
2W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Hunter Coleman
5W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Jeff Buse
6W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Leland Chrisman
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.