Teams

A9 Three Chopt Pearson Breakers

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-27vs A7 RMC SweeneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesToni O'Reilly / Felicia Schooley vs Brenda Tyson / Cynthia Muncy0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCam Nguyen / Marineth Kight vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-24vs A3 ACAC StephensWon 10
W#1 DoublesFelicia Schooley / Toni O'Reilly vs Betsy Civilette / Robin Griffith7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAngie Pearson / Marineth Kight vs Ariel Trimiew / Joy Nyman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-22vs A6 Belmont SherdelWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Mortimer / Marineth Kight vs Laura Ransone / Linda Benson6-3, 6-3
2023-04-08vs A2 Dominion Sweeney/ WagnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarineth Kight / Donna Hall vs Annmarie Lobred / Heidi Collier0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesToni O'Reilly / Karen Devalk vs Michele Limoges / Rhonda Underwood3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Karen Devalk
published
3.29
Toni O'Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Cam Nguyen
published 3.5
3.16
Donna Wade
published 3.5
3.15
Donna Hall
published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Skorupa
published
3.11
Felicia Schooley
published 3.5
3.05
Marineth Kight
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.95
Angie Pearson
published 3.5
2.92
Katherine Mortimer
published
2.83
Amanda Edmondson
published 3
2.77
C Suzanne Finley
published 3
Shelly Galles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Hall + Katherine Mortimer033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Mortimer + Melissa Skorupa033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Devalk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Toni O'Reilly
62W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Cam Nguyen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Donna Wade
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Donna Hall
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Melissa Skorupa
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Felicia Schooley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Marineth Kight
118W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
3.5
Angie Pearson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Katherine Mortimer
7W–21L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Amanda Edmondson
27W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
C Suzanne Finley
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Shelly Galles
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.