Teams

Naples Beach Club - Eddy

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 DoublesMarcia McCabe / Nina Akel vs Lisa Hayes / Michelle Young5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesNina Akel / Marcia McCabe vs Janice Gardetto / Corey Doering3-6, 3-6
2022-02-14vs The Quarry - PecoraroWon 10
W#3 DoublesJosephine Angevin / Marcia McCabe vs Martha Pecoraro / Aileen Jacobs6-1, 6-2
2022-02-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesJosephine Angevin / Marcia McCabe vs Peggy Garrity / Valorie Tobias6-3, 6-0
2022-01-14vs Pelican Bay South- ZubLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartha Scott / Marcia McCabe vs Behnoosh Behmaram / Elyse Descalzi5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debi Alameda
published 3
2.68
Becky Titmus
published 3
2.48
Marcia McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Josephine Angevin
published
Martha Scott
published
Nina Akel
published
Patricia Dumont
published
Paula Taylor
published
Sharon Struthers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Scott + Sharon Struthers6168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debi Alameda
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Becky Titmus
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Marcia McCabe
29W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Josephine Angevin
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Scott
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nina Akel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Dumont
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Taylor
26W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Struthers
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.