Teams

The Quarry - Pecoraro

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDenise Dennie / Diane Kaplan vs Robin Harper / Beverley Wilen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Lichterman / Norma Goldman vs Laurie Dwyer / Julie Furlong-Jones5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-02-25vs Pelican Marsh - GrecoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Shelly Brown vs Beth Gilman / Barbara Johnson-Salenko4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Kaplan / Aileen Jacobs vs Patricia Albrite / Joyce Bunting1-6, 0-6
2022-02-18vs Island Walk - ConawayWon 10
W#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Shelly Brown vs DEBRA BATES / Francine Pfohl6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Maria Lichterman vs Karen Harmon / Patricia Sullivan4-6, 5-7
2022-02-11vs GreyHawk - MooneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesNorma Goldman / Maria Lichterman vs Diana Provence / Keryl Ball7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-01-28vs Fiddlers Creek - L. FarnhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Maria Lichterman vs Carole Sloan / Barbara Country2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-21vs Pelican Bay South- ZubLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Lichterman / Norma Goldman vs Elyse Descalzi / Beth HUGHES7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-01-07vs Bay Colony - B. AllenWon 10
W#2 DoublesNorma Goldman / Diane Kaplan vs Lisa Ratner / Laurie Student6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Maria Lichterman
published
2.82
Norma Goldman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Audrey Schwartz
published 3
2.72
Denise Dennie
published 3
2.48
Diane Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Aileen Jacobs
published 2.5
Sharon Sokolsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norma Goldman + Denise Dennie404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Lichterman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Norma Goldman
44W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Audrey Schwartz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Denise Dennie
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Diane Kaplan
31W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Aileen Jacobs
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Sokolsky
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.