Teams

Sorrow

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-02vs YoungWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Amy Weathers vs Sharel Hooper / Emily Bagley3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Jazan Powell vs Lynne Barkeloo / Terri Brunvoll6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Elizabeth Morgan vs Lynn Pierce / Carol Tigar6-2, 6-2
2025-11-25vs YoungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJazan Powell / Jessica Carter vs Betsy Wilson / Carol Tigar6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Cielene Aleksejus vs Angie Cowart / Anthea Young6-0
2025-11-18vs YoungWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Simmons / Jazan Powell vs Lucynda Cynda Holmes / Carol Tigar3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Elizabeth Morgan vs Marialice Hatch / Angie Cowart5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRaquel Riesco / Courtney Andreach vs Lynne Barkeloo / Serena Lau6-0, 6-3
2025-11-11Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJazan Powell / Ellan Hubbard vs Carol Tigar / Sharel Hooper4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRaquel Riesco vs Betsy Wilson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Kelley Finnell vs Lynne Barkeloo / Serena Lau2-6, 0-6
2025-11-04vs YoungLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllan Hubbard / Jazan Powell vs LINDA van der MERWE / Lucynda Cynda Holmes4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Courtney Andreach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Ellan Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Amy Weathers
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.36
Jill Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Heather Tuttle
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Morgan
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Rauch
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.11
Jazan Powell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Anita Decosimo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Ashley Sorrow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Cielene Aleksejus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kelley Finnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Raquel Riesco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Weathers + Michelle Rauch3649% games+1.0% vs expected
Amy Weathers + Jill Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Sorrow + Cielene Aleksejus224 matchesnot enough data
Jazan Powell + Courtney Andreach314 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Sorrow + Kelley Finnell123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Sorrow + Michelle Rauch123 matchesnot enough data
Cielene Aleksejus + Kelley Finnell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Andreach
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Ellan Hubbard
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Amy Weathers
60W–36L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jill Robinson
35W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Heather Tuttle
43W–71L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Morgan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Rauch
33W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Jazan Powell
6W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Anita Decosimo
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ashley Sorrow
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Cielene Aleksejus
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Kelley Finnell
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
Raquel Riesco
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.