Teams

Young

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-02vs SorrowLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharel Hooper / Emily Bagley vs Anita Decosimo / Amy Weathers6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAnthea Young vs Heather Tuttle2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Pierce / Carol Tigar vs Ellan Hubbard / Elizabeth Morgan2-6, 2-6
2025-11-25vs SorrowLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Cowart / Anthea Young vs Ashley Sorrow / Cielene Aleksejus0-6
2025-11-18vs SorrowLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarialice Hatch / Angie Cowart vs Ellan Hubbard / Elizabeth Morgan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAngie Cowart / Charmaine Kincaid vs Jill Robinson / Marialice Hatch4-6, 3-6
2025-11-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Cowart / Marialice Hatch vs Elizabeth Morgan / Michelle Larson2-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs SorrowWon 21
L#1 SinglesLynn Pierce vs Heather Tuttle0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLINDA van der MERWE / Lucynda Cynda Holmes vs Ellan Hubbard / Jazan Powell6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngie Cowart / Emily Bagley vs Michelle Rauch / Leslie Simmons6-1, 6-0
2025-10-19vs NOGTA/Carol TigarLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Cowart / Claire Mcvay vs Carol Tigar / Kimberly Rogg0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Carol Tigar
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Sharel Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.39
Lynne Barkeloo
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
3.37
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.36
Emily Bagley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Serena Lau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Marialice Hatch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Dee Dee Buckley
published 3.5
3.24
Anthea Young
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Angie Cowart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.94
Lynn Pierce
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
LINDA van der MERWE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Brunvoll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharel Hooper + Carol Tigar9268% games+8.6% vs expected
Serena Lau + Lynne Barkeloo8264% games+7.8% vs expected
Dee Dee Buckley + Lucynda Cynda Holmes5360% games+3.7% vs expected
Carol Tigar + Marialice Hatch3253% games+1.1% vs expected
Terri Brunvoll + Lynne Barkeloo224 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Barkeloo + Anthea Young123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Tigar
58W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Sharel Hooper
30W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lynne Barkeloo
88W–41L career · 19 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
35W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Emily Bagley
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
Serena Lau
41W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
Marialice Hatch
33W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Dee Dee Buckley
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Anthea Young
10W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Angie Cowart
17W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Lynn Pierce
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
LINDA van der MERWE
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Terri Brunvoll
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.