Teams

Lagoon Holmes

2026 Spring USTA Mixed 18 & Over League-Montgomery · 3.5 18 & Over Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-15vs Lagoon RobinsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather O'Brien / Brennan Parks vs Catherine Williams / Trevor Boyer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesApril Terry / Christopher Traff vs Rebekah Filson / William Filson6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs Lagoon RobinsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaisy Zaner / Mark Zaner vs Trevor Boyer / Leslie Calloway0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Killingsworth / Douglas Seaton vs Sueanne Reynolds / Will Jacks1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Martin / Jimmy Martin vs Wesley Robinson / Holly Sharp1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 18 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Antonio Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Christopher Traff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Molly Killingsworth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Heather O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Daisy Zaner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Brennan Parks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Richard Caldwell
published
3.07
Levani Odikadze
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Jimmy Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
April Terry
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.79
Rebecca Pines
published
Douglas Seaton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Zaner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antonio Holmes
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Christopher Traff
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Molly Killingsworth
52W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Heather O'Brien
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Daisy Zaner
43W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Brennan Parks
0W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Richard Caldwell
8W–24L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Levani Odikadze
25W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Jimmy Martin
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
April Terry
28W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Rebecca Pines
18W–48L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Douglas Seaton
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Zaner
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.