Teams

Lagoon Robinson

2026 Spring USTA Mixed 18 & Over League-Montgomery · 3.5 18 & Over Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-15vs Lagoon HolmesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Williams / Trevor Boyer vs Heather O'Brien / Brennan Parks6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebekah Filson / William Filson vs April Terry / Christopher Traff0-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-02-22vs Lagoon HolmesWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrevor Boyer / Leslie Calloway vs Daisy Zaner / Mark Zaner6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSueanne Reynolds / Will Jacks vs Molly Killingsworth / Douglas Seaton6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWesley Robinson / Holly Sharp vs Cheryl Martin / Jimmy Martin6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 18 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Leslie Calloway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Frank Snowden
published
3.41
Wesley Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Will Jacks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Melissa Snowden
published
3.40
Justin Ward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Trevor Boyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Holly Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Mohamed Eldemerdash
published
3.24
Sueanne Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Catherine Williams
published 3.5
2.90
Rebekah Filson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Ward
published
William Filson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Sharp + Wesley Robinson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Calloway
43W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
Frank Snowden
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Wesley Robinson
29W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
Will Jacks
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Melissa Snowden
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Justin Ward
15W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Trevor Boyer
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Holly Sharp
63W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Mohamed Eldemerdash
28W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Sueanne Reynolds
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Catherine Williams
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Rebekah Filson
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Linda Ward
10W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Filson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.