Teams

GJTC KKILLIAN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-10vs GJTC JWENDTLost 01
L#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Brad Krebill vs John Wendt / Ryan Scotting0-6, 1-6
2022-05-08vs GJTC RPLETTLost 02
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Dan Terrell vs Dan Johnson / Lee Smith0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSeth Ritchey / Andy Ford vs John Kohls / Stephen Kurtenbach4-6, 2-6
2022-04-26vs GJTC RSHARPSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAndy Ford / Seth Ritchey vs Trace Radler / Jimmy Renfroe2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Kevin McGuinness vs John Groves / Rex Zerr6-3, 6-4
2022-04-12vs GJTC RPLETTSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSeth Ritchey vs Dan Johnson5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Kevin McGuinness vs Whit Blair / Kriss Burwell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Dannibale
published 4
3.11
Seth Ritchey
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
Keith Killian
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Dan Terrell
published 3
Andy Ford
published
Biff Messinger
published
Jonathan St.Peter
published
Kevin McGuinness
published
Matt Delao
published
Michael Welling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Ritchey + Keith Killian1735% games−9.6% vs expected
Dan Terrell + Matt Delao0534% gamesnot enough data
Dan Terrell + Seth Ritchey134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin McGuinness + Keith Killian134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Dannibale
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Seth Ritchey
40W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Keith Killian
40W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Dan Terrell
18W–47L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Andy Ford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Biff Messinger
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan St.Peter
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin McGuinness
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Delao
4W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Welling
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.