Teams

GJTC RSHARP

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-10vs GJTC RPLETTLost 14
L#1 DoublesGary Kahn / Bradley Feldhaus vs Aammar Hussieno / David Fife3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJimmy Renfroe vs Stephen Kurtenbach3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRex Zerr / Stuart Hall vs Steve Watson / Whit Blair7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJohn Hanna vs Christopher Cutsforth2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRodney Sharp / John Rhoads vs Kriss Burwell / Lee Smith6-2, 6-4
2022-04-19vs GJTC RPLETTWon 32
W#1 DoublesStuart Hall / John Hanna vs Christopher Cutsforth / Skyler Cutsforth6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJimmy Renfroe vs Whit Blair1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTrace Radler / John Rhoads vs David Fife / John Kohls2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGary Kahn vs Stephen Kurtenbach3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRex Zerr / John Groves vs Steve Watson / Lee Smith4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-05vs GJTC KKILLIANLost 01
L#2 DoublesJimmy Renfroe / David Pacini vs Curt Hansen / Matt Delao4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Stuart Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
John Hanna
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Bradley Feldhaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cy Allen
published 3.5
Gary Kahn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
David Pacini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Jimmy Renfroe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
John Rhoads
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rex Zerr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rodney Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trace Radler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hanna + Stuart Hall15461% games+4.1% vs expected
David Pacini + Jimmy Renfroe0533% gamesnot enough data
David Pacini + Rodney Sharp213 matchesnot enough data
John Rhoads + Rex Zerr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stuart Hall
69W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.54
John Hanna
97W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Bradley Feldhaus
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cy Allen
30W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gary Kahn
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Pacini
80W–113L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jimmy Renfroe
31W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
John Rhoads
7W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rex Zerr
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rodney Sharp
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Trace Radler
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.