BRMST PINK
2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings49 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1KC-RH BLACK | 7 | 0 | 20 | 254 |
| 2CHCC BLUE | 6 | 1 | 25 | 244 |
| 3PRC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 26 | 288 |
| 4WP GOLD | 5 | 2 | 30 | 265 |
| 5DCC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 30 | 275 |
| 6BCC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 32 | 283 |
| 7WP SILVER | 5 | 2 | 32 | 291 |
| 8HG TEAL | 5 | 2 | 33 | 267 |
| 9PH NAVY | 5 | 2 | 33 | 287 |
| 10GR NAVY | 5 | 2 | 34 | 309 |
| 11HRCA-N GREEN | 5 | 2 | 35 | 306 |
| 12HIW RED | 5 | 2 | 35 | 314 |
| 13CP GOLD | 5 | 2 | 37 | 307 |
| 14SS-HP PURPLE | 4 | 2 | 29 | 249 |
| 15BTA-IBM YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 31 | 281 |
| 16CP ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 33 | 286 |
| 17KC-RH PINK | 4 | 3 | 34 | 313 |
| 18LTC-M GREEN | 4 | 3 | 35 | 288 |
| 19MEA GOLD | 4 | 3 | 39 | 310 |
| 20HRCA-N ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 40 | 296 |
| 21HW BLUE | 4 | 3 | 41 | 316 |
| 22BCC RED | 4 | 3 | 43 | 317 |
| 23HFII GREEN | 4 | 3 | 45 | 352 |
| 24CVTA YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 36 | 307 |
| 25CACM TEAL | 3 | 4 | 37 | 301 |
| 26HRCA-S YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 38 | 309 |
| 27PCC PURPLE | 3 | 4 | 38 | 296 |
| 28HW TEAL | 3 | 4 | 39 | 310 |
| 29ATC RED | 3 | 4 | 40 | 305 |
| 30SS-LT ORANGE | 3 | 4 | 40 | 327 |
| 31GTC PURPLE | 3 | 4 | 44 | 314 |
| 32CP RED | 3 | 4 | 44 | 324 |
| 33BTA-C RED | 3 | 4 | 44 | 340 |
| 34KC-CC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 45 | 345 |
| 35PTC PINK | 3 | 4 | 45 | 344 |
| 36SKY ORANGE | 3 | 4 | 46 | 325 |
| 37DTC PURPLE | 2 | 5 | 43 | 325 |
| 38SS-H GREEN | 2 | 5 | 44 | 309 |
| 39MEA PINK | 2 | 5 | 49 | 352 |
| 40PCC GREEN | 2 | 5 | 51 | 367 |
| 41BRMST PINK | 2 | 5 | 52 | 353 |
| 42GCC NAVY | 1 | 6 | 50 | 356 |
| 43SS-HP RED | 1 | 6 | 54 | 370 |
| 44SS-LGT BLACK | 0 | 6 | 47 | 329 |
| 45CP YELLOW | 0 | 7 | 49 | 351 |
| 46PCRK RED | 0 | 7 | 54 | 368 |
| 47CVTA GREEN | 0 | 7 | 56 | 378 |
| 48LTC-M BLUE | 0 | 7 | 56 | 373 |
| 49MVCC RED | 0 | 7 | 64 | 400 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Michelle Karr + Sarah Post | 4–1 | 60% games | +12.1% vs expected |
| Sandy Sutton + Cheryl Williams | 8–1 | 57% games | +8.0% vs expected |
| Carol Anderson + Sarah Post | 8–3 | 53% games | +4.9% vs expected |
| Carol Anderson + Ann Ipsen | 3–3 | 55% games | +4.3% vs expected |
| Sandy Sutton + Sarah Post | 3–2 | 48% games | +3.7% vs expected |
| Cheryl Williams + Sarah Post | 13–11 | 50% games | +0.0% vs expected |
| Kari Diamond + Sandy Sutton | 2–4 | 46% games | −10.3% vs expected |
| Carol Anderson + Cheryl Williams | 3–2 | 51% games | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.