Teams

BTA-C RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-29vs LTA-P PURPLEWon 41
W#1 DoublesStephanie Watson / Lindsey Killion vs Stephanie Stone / Tanya Eisele7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEmily Gaud vs Gloria Andrews1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Henderson / Kristi Gray vs Kris Graham / Kirstin Santa Scholberg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVeronica Johnston vs Kristin Parsons6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Dierking / Meghan Donahue vs Sally Meier / Sonia Marrero6-2, 6-4
2025-05-22vs BCC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesStephanie Watson / Kristi Gray vs Ashley Devery / Teri Starry4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Killion vs Allison Faldi1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine Dierking / Emily Gaud vs Christine Gould / Anna Mark7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Ashley Rogers6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Donahue / Ruth Henderson vs Frances Friedland / Mary Pfeiffer3-6, 4-6
2025-05-20vs MEA GOLDWon 32
L#1 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Christy Valentine vs Kara McDowell / Hilary Talocco3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLindsey Killion vs Sarah Streett6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristi Gray / Meghan Donahue vs Catherine Faughnan / Julie von Eschen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Emily Stinchcomb6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEmily Gaud / Ruth Henderson vs Victoria Koury / Tamara Harvey2-6, 4-6
2025-05-15vs RCC GREENWon 32
L#1 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Christy Valentine vs Jill Keogh / Nancy Beaton7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Jennifer Schierkolk6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Watson / Lindsey Killion vs Lisa Highley / Cindy Ronlov6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Gaud vs Tonya Johnson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMeghan Donahue / Ruth Henderson vs Megan Terrell / Tayrien Holocher7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-08vs CVTA YELLOWLost 14
L#1 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Christy Valentine vs Carmel Gill / Thelma Condon1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Isabella Jacobs3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJORDAN KAAR / Meghan Donahue vs Linda Levy / Jackye Whalen2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWendy Scipione vs Sarah Abernathey2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Gaud / Katherine Dierking vs Shannon Derby / Jenny Bach2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-24vs TTA BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Christy Valentine vs Casey Ahn-O'Connor / Jessica Kroupa1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsey Killion vs Emily Brennan6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Watson / Kristi Gray vs Lynn Hayes / Amy Butler6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Madison Fischer3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Donahue / JORDAN KAAR vs Sonia Johnson / Hieu Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-17vs LTA-Q REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Christy Valentine vs Lori Preston / Tsugumi Richards6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLindsey Killion vs Paige Sopcic7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJORDAN KAAR / Katherine Dierking vs Lisa Maggio / Julie Fletcher2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWendy Scipione vs Carol Schwendener3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Henderson / Emily Gaud vs Tara Tovar / Paige Schauermann6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings49 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KC-RH BLACK7028720254
2CHCC BLUE61251025244
3PRC BLUE5226926288
4WP GOLD52221330265
5DCC GREEN52231230275
6BCC BLUE52221332283
7WP SILVER52211432291
8HG TEAL52211433267
9PH NAVY52211433287
10GR NAVY52221334309
11HRCA-N GREEN52201535306
12HIW RED52201535314
13CP GOLD52201537307
14SS-HP PURPLE42161429249
15BTA-IBM YELLOW43211431281
16CP ORANGE43191633286
17KC-RH PINK43201534313
18LTC-M GREEN43181735288
19MEA GOLD43181739310
20HRCA-N ORANGE43171840296
21HW BLUE43181741316
22BCC RED43152043317
23HFII GREEN43171845352
24CVTA YELLOW34201536307
25CACM TEAL34191637301
26HRCA-S YELLOW34181738309
27PCC PURPLE34181738296
28HW TEAL34191639310
29ATC RED34171840305
30SS-LT ORANGE34181740327
31GTC PURPLE34152044314
32CP RED34171844324
33BTA-C RED34171844340
34KC-CC BLUE34152045345
35PTC PINK34152045344
36SKY ORANGE34152046325
37DTC PURPLE25161943325
38SS-H GREEN25152044309
39MEA PINK25122349352
40PCC GREEN25122351367
41BRMST PINK25112452353
42GCC NAVY16122350356
43SS-HP RED1692654370
44SS-LGT BLACK0682247329
45CP YELLOW07132249351
46PCRK RED07112454368
47CVTA GREEN0782756378
48LTC-M BLUE0782756373
49MVCC RED0753064400

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kristi Gray
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Mandy Jasper
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Lindsey Killion
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Veronica Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
Emily Gaud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Christy Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Stephanie Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Katherine Dierking
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Ruth Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
JORDAN KAAR
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Meghan Donahue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wendy Scipione
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Watson + Lindsey Killion7261% games+10.6% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Mandy Jasper5749% games+2.6% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Katherine Dierking4251% games+1.5% vs expected
Veronica Johnston + Christy Valentine3848% games+0.6% vs expected
Kristi Gray + Ruth Henderson6649% games+0.1% vs expected
Mandy Jasper + Veronica Johnston3450% games−0.3% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Ruth Henderson3242% games−0.8% vs expected
Wendy Scipione + Ruth Henderson3544% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Gray
62W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Mandy Jasper
60W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Lindsey Killion
67W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Veronica Johnston
49W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Emily Gaud
34W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Christy Valentine
45W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Stephanie Watson
53W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Katherine Dierking
58W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
Ruth Henderson
70W–114L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
JORDAN KAAR
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
Meghan Donahue
21W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Scipione
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.