Teams

Geci/18/3.5/WN/LEGA

2024 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hottes/18/WN/BREC9036927288
2Jaureguy/18/3.5/WN/BREC8136924300
3Bordlee/18/3.5/WN/BREC63242147359
4Jenkins/18/3.5/WN/BREC54242145371
5deVeer/18/3.5/WN/BREC54252048374
6Murrell/18/3.5/WN/BRCC45202558430
7Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UC45192658440
8Davis/18/3.5/WN/LSU-O27162964434
9Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCL27153065446
10Geci/18/3.5/WN/LEGA09103572466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Melissa Geci
published
3.47
Vikki Donadieu
published
3.39
Anna Boykin
published 3.5
3.35
Ashley Ledet
published 3.5
3.29
Megan Songy
published
3.23
Ashley Belcher
published 3.5
3.19
Tanyau Hughes
published
3.19
Mikelyn Marcomb
published
3.15
3.14
3.04
Britni Pritchard
published 3
2.73
JACKIE HARRELL
published 3
2.59
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Boykin + Vikki Donadieu9464% games+14.4% vs expected
Anna Boykin + Melissa Geci4261% games+14.3% vs expected
Melissa Geci + Vikki Donadieu19954% games+4.9% vs expected
Ashley Belcher + Chloe Collins Freeman8851% games+3.8% vs expected
Melissa Geci + Mikelyn Marcomb211258% games+1.8% vs expected
Vikki Donadieu + Mikelyn Marcomb3251% games−6.7% vs expected
Ashley Ledet + Tanyau Hughes044 matchesnot enough data
Chloe Collins Freeman + Britni Pritchard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Geci
99W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Vikki Donadieu
64W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Anna Boykin
42W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Ashley Ledet
48W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Megan Songy
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Ashley Belcher
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Tanyau Hughes
20W–42L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Mikelyn Marcomb
44W–47L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Claire Daigrepont Andry
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Chloe Collins Freeman
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Britni Pritchard
33W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
JACKIE HARRELL
25W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Danielle Skrandel
20W–29L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.