Teams

Grace's Aces

2021 MTL Mixed 40 & Over Spring · MTL Mixed 40 & Over 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.67 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesDan Winicour / Stephanie Evans vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-10vs High RollersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesReginald Tull / Stephanie Evans vs Laura Smith / Aravind Krishna6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMalini Sekhar / Jonathan Santos vs Aileen Jones / Chris Ford6-2, 6-4
2021-07-18vs High RollersWon 10
W#3 DoublesChris Downs / Malini Sekhar vs Kelley Regan / Eric Nguyen6-0, 6-3
2021-07-10vs High RollersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathan Santos / Malini Sekhar vs Zachary Jones / Michele Davis5-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesReginald Tull / Inese Williamson vs Alicia Rowley / Romeo Cinco3-6, 6-6
2021-06-27vs High RollersLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Winicour / Ye Hu vs Peter Nguyen / Erika Trost4-6, 1-3
2021-06-26vs High RollersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDan Winicour / Grace Kim vs Erika Trost / Zachary Jones1-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MTL Mixed 40 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.07
Inese Williamson
published 5
4.56
Landon Schaefer
published
4.49
Leah Noonan
published
4.47
Prem Vadlamudi
published 5
4.45
Rohan Wadehra
published
4.34
Malini Sekhar
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Ye Hu
published
4.25
Reginald Tull
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Dan Winicour
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Jonathan Santos
published
4.11
Chris Downs
published 4.5
3.98
Tuyet Cahill
published
Jason Wall
published
Kara Stevenson
published
Stephanie Evans
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Inese Williamson
28W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
5.07
Landon Schaefer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.56
Leah Noonan
50W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
4.49
5
Prem Vadlamudi
60W–37L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
4.47
Rohan Wadehra
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
4.45
4.5
Malini Sekhar
177W–94L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
Ye Hu
31W–23L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Reginald Tull
170W–99L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Dan Winicour
106W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
Jonathan Santos
74W–27L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Chris Downs
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.11
Tuyet Cahill
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.98
Jason Wall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kara Stevenson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Evans
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.