Teams

High Rollers

2021 MTL Mixed 40 & Over Spring · MTL Mixed 40 & Over 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-18vs Grace's AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Nguyen / Erika Trost vs Chris Downs / Ye Hu3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-08-08vs Grace's AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesErika Trost / Christopher Cosca vs Landon Schaefer / Leah Noonan6-7, 3-4
2021-07-17vs Grace's AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Cosca / Erika Trost vs Ye Hu / Jonathan Santos2-6, 3-4
2021-06-27vs Grace's AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Nguyen / Erika Trost vs Dan Winicour / Ye Hu6-4, 3-1
2021-06-26vs Grace's AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesErika Trost / Zachary Jones vs Dan Winicour / Grace Kim6-1, 5-4
2021-06-17vs Grace's AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesErika Trost / Zachary Jones vs Ye Hu / Christopher Hethcox6-2, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MTL Mixed 40 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Alicia Rowley
published 5
4.58
Erika Trost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.51
Kelley Regan
published
4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.32
Vaughn Gatling
published 4.5
4.30
Zachary Jones
published
4.24
Christopher Cosca
published 4.5
4.15
Michele Davis
published
3.96
Aileen Jones
published 4
3.89
Marie Taylor
published
3.87
Thuan Lai
published
3.63
Chris Ford
published 4
3.56
Deann Zoghlin
published 4
Kerrie Jenkins
published
Laura Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vaughn Gatling + Erika Trost3352% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Regan + Christopher Cosca044 matchesnot enough data
Aravind Krishna + Aileen Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alicia Rowley
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Erika Trost
383W–194L career · 6 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.58
Kelley Regan
19W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.51
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
4.36
4.5
Vaughn Gatling
69W–39L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
4.32
Zachary Jones
30W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Christopher Cosca
82W–117L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
Michele Davis
28W–24L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.15
4
Aileen Jones
48W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
Marie Taylor
16W–18L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.89
Thuan Lai
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Chris Ford
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Deann Zoghlin
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Kerrie Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.